| ??? 01/18/05 17:17 Read: times |
#85205 - something like this... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Neil Kurzman said:
You can use a switch stament in the function.
Bit indirection in the 51' would be great, but they did not think so 24 years ago. // Perform a Reset on the specified 1-Wire net
unsigned char Ow_Reset( unsigned char net_num )
{
switch( net_num )
{
case 1: return Ow_Reset_1(); // Perform a Reset on 1-Wire net No 1
case 2: return Ow_Reset_2(); // Perform a Reset on 1-Wire net No 2
case 3: return Ow_Reset_3(); // Perform a Reset on 1-Wire net No 3
}
}But I still say that doing all three simultaneously is worth a look - awaiting Leon's input on whether it could work for him...
|
| Topic | Author | Date |
| sbit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You mean Dallas 1-Wire? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the problem? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indirect bit addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The same iButton on all 3? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sbit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| access all 3 , one at a time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had the same problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lets try again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Need ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is always the switch statement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| something like this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simultaneous example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use MASK rather than bit address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oooops, sorry... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Multiple 1Wire | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How to post code, and possible hang-up | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simultaneous? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| would even be better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If it worked! | 01/01/70 00:00 |