??? 02/14/05 15:36 Read: times |
#87383 - What is less pain? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Depends on the state of project.
Sebastian said: If no or little code has been written, or is very simple and/or in C or similar; and if it is a hobby project or only a few pieces are to be made; it is surely less pain to invert the reset (which might be already available nearby, as many reset chips have both outputs) than to redesign the whole board or to try to stick a SMD part (SiLabs) somehow.
Furthermore, I have the pcb prototypes, I'd love to recycle them with minor changes. The LPC parts surely don't fit as Sebastian needs many pins (and LPC=Low Pin Count :-) Jan Waclawek |
Topic | Author | Date |
three level output with resistors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Buffer your pins... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the advantage of '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try ATmega8515 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
or try a modern '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... and are not pin compatible... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pin-compatible but reset is negative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What is less pain? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not any more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
where do you get your info? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the horses mouth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hmmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pico gates, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if just one unit or maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
3 levels possible on 8051 without buffer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the goalpost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
gotcha | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The solution, but ... (almost off topic)![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A possible solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
deja vu? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Whoops! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
flat style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
aka | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
R-2R | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
R-2R? | 01/01/70 00:00 |