| ??? 02/24/05 14:16 Read: times |
#88336 - are you? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Are you one of those that have been conned into "the MAX232(equivalent is not needed"?
Than your problem could be just that. Usually when someone compares 2 Windows versions that mean a new PC. And a new PC is when the con reveals itself. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| UART doesn't work in XP HyperTerminal? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Settings ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It has Identical settings on XP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Turn Off handshaking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Port com does function fine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What LED? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Com port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| are you? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The max232 is not needed????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It *is* needed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mainboard's com is right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| loopback | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I already probed the port, cable 0.5mts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| too much confidence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Waaaaaaaaay too much confidence !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it would be some drivers missing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some Drivers Really Missing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do the loopback! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try one more. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Really?? | 01/01/70 00:00 |