| ??? 03/05/05 01:27 Read: times |
#89149 - Assumptions Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
There is a difference, if the translation should be working at all times, or be efficient.
... Not trivial at all. I should have checked the AVR docs first. This being an 8052 forum, I assumed the AVR chips were similar to the 8052 architecture (and we all know what happens when one assumes ;-) Nevertheless, it is a language translation problem, and in principle no different than writing a compiler. But I stand corrected...it would very likely take more time than the estimate I gave. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 Assembler Source Converter ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you can't find one... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try to speak with guys from datatek | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sdcc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Translator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not so fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Shove, not push | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 & AVR similar? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Of course C ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| acc - the least of a problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assumptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| let's try... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in the olden days, I did | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm inclined to C | 01/01/70 00:00 |