??? 03/07/05 17:15 Read: times |
#89229 - got curious and looked Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Got curious and looked at the routine in delay.c
I think you'll find that this is a routine that lots of people have used without complaint. 1) Testing proves diddelysquat. 2) there is no indication whatsoever what osc freq it is supposed to match. 3) it may or may not match, C is free to generate any code it desires and, hopefully, every new release will be better. Loop delay routines should never be in C. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
LCD< | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
must be a bug in lcd_write() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bug in lcd_write | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Stand corrected | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
further corrected | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Makes sense | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Delay after the character write? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
unknown bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ANSI divergence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Are you sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
skdjfhg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It realy works fine with UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Story so far | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil and Function pointers? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Kaiwalya - O.T | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Let me try | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Post the real code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Possibilities | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ksfd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Troll | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the real issue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Corrections | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Small but fast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MIPS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Corrections | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sldkjf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
dkfuhg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Corrections | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Corrections | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
got curious and looked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm wrong - Damn! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
debugging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Post you real code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How to initilize 4X20 LCD![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |