Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/20/05 15:32
Read: times


 
#95367 - keep it going
Responding to: ???'s previous message
There is no specification of stack usage in the datasheets so I set SP to FEh (just to accomodate the return address for LCALL 0FFF0h) ... And it fails to program, crashes etc. (OK I did not try this but I suspect it will).
It will

What did I wrong?
Create a case just to state a point that otherwise is meaningless.

As a peace offering (to get this thread ended):
I can see all the points/uses mentioned, just can not see the original IAP code creators having them in the specs. Most of us have been asked to create something that could do 'x' just to be asked, after completion, "why can it not do 'y'.

So, the solution I'll recommend (as I have done before) is to rely on XRAM for whatever need be carried over and just do a reset after using IAP. This may not be "the best thing since sliced bread", but it works.

Erik




List of 42 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
IAP Problem in AT89C51RD2            01/01/70 00:00      
   IAP PROBLEM            01/01/70 00:00      
      misinterpretations            01/01/70 00:00      
   IAP source            01/01/70 00:00      
      IAP source?            01/01/70 00:00      
         ..xC51x.. IAP API            01/01/70 00:00      
            oh those...            01/01/70 00:00      
               IAP            01/01/70 00:00      
                  sorry...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  IAP            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes, but..            01/01/70 00:00      
                  bootloader            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Depressing, isn't it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        complaining to Atmel?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           please, WHAT is the problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Not at all...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 comments            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    More comments            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       comments on more comments            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          other way 'round (a pinch of irony)            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             keep it going            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                What's the point?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          COMCOMC            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             for those of you who need this            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                straighforward?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Interrupts            01/01/70 00:00      
      The coments are in spanish if you are in            01/01/70 00:00      
         Translation?            01/01/70 00:00      
            The code            01/01/70 00:00      
   IAP on Atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      only 16 bytes?            01/01/70 00:00      
         don't know            01/01/70 00:00      
            that might be the explanation            01/01/70 00:00      
      Are you overwriting your own code? Where            01/01/70 00:00      
         code example            01/01/70 00:00      
            IAP Problem            01/01/70 00:00      
            My Code            01/01/70 00:00      
               This looks good...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Thank U for the Great support            01/01/70 00:00      
      I see many and no U            01/01/70 00:00      
      And what was the problem???            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not Yet            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List