Craig said NO and I accept it.

However, some arguments here - while many of them apply - but some of them I feel quite different.

For example, Craig (and Donald and perhaps others) argued that it will end up with the same amount of noice as the "points" system. I disagree. Points are too emotional. It resembles me the school, and perhaps nobody likes that system of "scoring". I think, laying out facts is not of that emotional nature and, even if some discussion can occur, it is fully public (contrary to the anonymous points).

Also, arguments are given, that there already are mechanisms to contribute faqs/tutorials. Yes, but there is little support for corrections (of mine or others contributions) and colaboration. I cannot sketch out the outline of a FAQ, perhaps filling later some of it, and leave it to the community to finish. It is just a too big responsibility to write a complete article, so I give it up right from the beginning.

Jan Waclawek