??? 06/28/05 13:18 Read: times |
#96103 - nope Responding to: ???'s previous message |
direct linking the chip name with the datasheet at the manufacturer.
Nope, e.g. Philips have revision id in the datasheet names e.g. P89LPC931A1_2.pdf. The _2 is probably already replace with a higher number Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
chips database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
chips lists, a warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
exactly for this reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I would rather | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
certainly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK then the other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it's about the sales ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the book | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I dunno | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How aboyt ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
EACH chip? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Chip Lists | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: chip lists | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
chip list | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tabular Device List | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'd be interested | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Device ID | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nahh... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
extra columns | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
appnotes list![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
chip lists | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Editable chip database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:editable chip database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
import from Keil vs. self-edited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
edible chips database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Now I got curious: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:editable chip database | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Device Database | 01/01/70 00:00 |