??? 07/22/05 20:09 Modified: 07/22/05 20:11 Read: times |
#97840 - no need Responding to: ???'s previous message |
the syntax may be incorrect, the compliler should also be specified
no need to specify the compiler, it states the problem is NOT the syntax. e.g. specifying the compiler as Keil would scare the SDCC people off. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
if anyone is interested | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The answer is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
absolutely | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
-1 Gimme Code ;-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
:-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
spelled out | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
first puzzle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to be finely honed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Honing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It'll happen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
methinks that, if this is to go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not broken, but partially shown | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IF YOU ARE INTERESTED in trying to solve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, and... code competitions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes Craig, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
code competition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I see the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oleg - e-mail me you have the address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
here we go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Very Nice.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I am impressed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm a beginner; I need assistance![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |