| ??? 07/22/05 20:30 Read: times |
#97843 - not broken, but partially shown Responding to: ???'s previous message |
As it is, the code is broken and there could be some question as to the logic given the broken syntax. And even though Erik specifically made it clear that the answer he is looking for is not a syntax correction, there will be people that ignore or don't notice that caveat and simply fix the syntax and think that that's the answer to the problem.
not broken, but partially shown, I deliberately did not show more since this is not about ring buffers, UART ISR techniques or any such thing. There are conflicting intersts here: partial show - someone will fix syntax, full show - someone will disacuss ring buffer theory. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| if anyone is interested | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The answer is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutely | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| -1 Gimme Code ;-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| spelled out | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| first puzzle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to be finely honed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Honing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It'll happen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| methinks that, if this is to go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not broken, but partially shown | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IF YOU ARE INTERESTED in trying to solve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, and... code competitions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes Craig, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| code competition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I see the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oleg - e-mail me you have the address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| here we go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very Nice.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I am impressed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm a beginner; I need assistance | 01/01/70 00:00 |