Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/12/05 16:10
Modified:
  08/12/05 16:13
Read: times


 		 #99284 - Another SAVE_CONTEXT
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Oleg said:

Well, now imagine what happenes if you try next:
:A_SUBROUTINE1:
CALL SAVE_CONTEXT
; some doing
CALL A_SUBROUTINE2
; some doing
CALL RESTORE_CONTEXT
RET
;
A_SUBROUTINE2:
CALL SAVE_CONTEXT
; some doing
CALL RESTORE_CONTEXT
RET
I think you catch the limitation of your method, do you?


Hello Dear Oleg
Why you don't use SAVE_CONTEXT1 instead of SAVE_CONTEXT
for A_SUBROUTINE2
In many case i prefer to use multiple routines instead of increasing stack,
Regards
Mehdi




List of 53 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Week puzzle            01/01/70 00:00      
   why is one a subroutine and another a ta            01/01/70 00:00      
      no RTOS            01/01/70 00:00      
   last there was discussion, in this an an            01/01/70 00:00      
      week            01/01/70 00:00      
   Last pushed in - first popped out            01/01/70 00:00      
      come in            01/01/70 00:00      
   Will it work?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes it will            01/01/70 00:00      
         Mmmmm?            01/01/70 00:00      
         And another thought            01/01/70 00:00      
            it's perfectly safe...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Still not convinced            01/01/70 00:00      
                  dangers            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Choices            01/01/70 00:00      
                        the same in real life            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Smart and Neat Code            01/01/70 00:00      
                              are you a math major? :)            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Not a maths major            01/01/70 00:00      
                        yes            01/01/70 00:00      
                  what dangerous            01/01/70 00:00      
                     If misuse is chronic...            01/01/70 00:00      
   CALL + RET != JUMP            01/01/70 00:00      
      ?????????            01/01/70 00:00      
         oops Oleg Has the code to manage it sorr            01/01/70 00:00      
            return address            01/01/70 00:00      
      you got it!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks for the puzzle :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
   a question            01/01/70 00:00      
      why not            01/01/70 00:00      
         well            01/01/70 00:00      
            optimisation            01/01/70 00:00      
               I have seen that happen when the require            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's the same than if you miss a push or            01/01/70 00:00      
         The Trick is:            01/01/70 00:00      
   the answer            01/01/70 00:00      
      you never answered            01/01/70 00:00      
         solid or intermittent problem            01/01/70 00:00      
            difference between solid or intermittent            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why Push!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
      side effect            01/01/70 00:00      
         Another SAVE_CONTEXT            01/01/70 00:00      
            Sounds like a housekeeping nightmare            01/01/70 00:00      
               Sounds like a housekeeping nightmare            01/01/70 00:00      
               it IS a housekeeping nightmare            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Pay no attention            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Donald, if you took the time to read wha            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Reading difficulties            01/01/70 00:00      
                              sorry, used wrong word            01/01/70 00:00      
                     no problem with any post, just with stat            01/01/70 00:00      
            maybe because            01/01/70 00:00      
      eh?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List