??? 09/28/05 07:38 Read: times |
#101641 - XRAM Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Regardless of what the X stands for*, what is the proper explanation of XRAM?
1. RAM integrated on-chip in excess of the "IRAM" and accessed using MOVX (maybe also switchable off/on using some SFR bit) (sometimes also usable as code memory on another SFR bit); or 2. any memory accessed by MOVX (i.e. "true" external + what is described in 1.) Jan Waclawek __________________________________ * another one: X as in MOVX |
Topic | Author | Date |
glossary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dunno, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
glossary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"external" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
explain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
indirect? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
XRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
XRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MOVX is the key | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sort of | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wikish | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
memory types and datatypes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
precise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
XDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: XDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why? does anyone ever look there | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We don't understand each other | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My understanding of the wiki was that it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wicked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re chip directories | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hang on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Congrats Steve.![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
stack =? IDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PDATA??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's the crux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
internal external | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is there is difference in... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
external vs internal XRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
or other sfr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ERAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wiki Wiki | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
glossary on wiki | 01/01/70 00:00 |