??? 09/28/05 08:54 Read: times |
#101648 - stack =? IDATA Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Oleg Sergeev said:
Let say, DATA and IDATA may be accessed [...] as well with PUSH/POP [...] There are derivatives (ADuC8xx I think) which allow to extend the stack into XDATA as well... Also, as I mentioned, some derivatives allow to use "internal XDATA" (what about iXDATA ?) as code memory, allowing MOVC access... And what about internal code memory which does not allow MOVC only execution (this is how IAP is implemented in LPC9xx)? Now this is getting really messy... Jan Waclawek |
Topic | Author | Date |
glossary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dunno, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
glossary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"external" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
explain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
indirect? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
XRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
XRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MOVX is the key | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sort of | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wikish | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
memory types and datatypes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
precise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
XDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: XDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
update | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why? does anyone ever look there | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We don't understand each other | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My understanding of the wiki was that it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wicked | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re chip directories | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hang on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Congrats Steve.![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
stack =? IDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PDATA??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's the crux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
internal external | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is there is difference in... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
external vs internal XRAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
or other sfr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ERAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wiki Wiki | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
glossary on wiki | 01/01/70 00:00 |