Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/17/05 17:12
Modified:
  10/17/05 17:15
Read: times


 		 #102497 - why
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I think what Atmel did was a - rather unsuccessful - technology shrink. I simply don't believe they would give up the old and proven 12-clocker core as a whole.
This could - perhaps - explain the rather alarming problems with various flags, the troubles with the XTAL2 drive, and also the rather unusual value of burden capacitors.

Jan Waclawek

[EDIT] whoops, I take it back - the S8253 seems to be a 6-clocker! Nevertheless there has been some substantial, I suppose; Atmel already has a proven 6-clock core from Temic...


List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
AT89S8253: another couple of problems            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not designed to drive additional loads            01/01/70 00:00      
      a quote            01/01/70 00:00      
         The Facts of the real world.            01/01/70 00:00      
            who said "buy from digikey"            01/01/70 00:00      
            Think about it            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Indeed I did, but please quote all I sai            01/01/70 00:00      
               Sorry..            01/01/70 00:00      
                  no offense, just wanted to make clear            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I don't want to attak            01/01/70 00:00      
                        not you Fausto            01/01/70 00:00      
         What do you make, Erik?            01/01/70 00:00      
            a lot of questions, a lot of answers            01/01/70 00:00      
               why            01/01/70 00:00      
               Guaranteed parameters            01/01/70 00:00      
                  There are, indeed, such references. Howe            01/01/70 00:00      
                     So TF2 problem is a hardware bug            01/01/70 00:00      
                        absolutely            01/01/70 00:00      
            one (bad) try and a suggestion            01/01/70 00:00      
               Re: one (bad) try and a suggestion            01/01/70 00:00      
   Newbie question...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Central clock versus decentral clocks            01/01/70 00:00      
         I would never use multiple non-synchroni            01/01/70 00:00      
      already suggested            01/01/70 00:00      
   Latest news on bugs in 8253            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List