??? 05/19/06 11:12 Read: times |
#116622 - By definition! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Christoph Franck said:
A stream of completely random bytes cannot be compressed meaningfully. One might add: "By Definition" All lossless compression schemes rely on the input data using more than one bit of data per actual "bit" of information; Lossy compression schemes (eg, JPEG, MPEG) rely on the assumption that you can throw away some real information without anyone really noticing... |
Topic | Author | Date |
Ram Compression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Elaborate please ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ram compression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What kind of data are we looking at ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Further elaboration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ram compression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Extra bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In that case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes it can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Err... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hang on a minute | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Information vs. Meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about helping rather than ridiculing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NOT ridiculing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
syntax error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a loony replies,its all in the entropy. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sparse data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Run-length encoding? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
proper run length coding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But how do you know... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
slight mistake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
By definition! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
go outside the box | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Or more RAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if 256 byte not sufficient![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |