??? 05/19/06 11:35 Read: times |
#116625 - Err... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Steve M. Taylor said:
it can be perfectly compressed, since it contains no information No - it contains 100% information, since no value can be predicted from the value(s) of the preceeding sample(s)! a random source at the other end can reproduce it to any required degree. No - it will produce another random sequence - not re-produce the same sequence! |
Topic | Author | Date |
Ram Compression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Elaborate please ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ram compression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What kind of data are we looking at ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Further elaboration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ram compression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Extra bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In that case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes it can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Err... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hang on a minute | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Information vs. Meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about helping rather than ridiculing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NOT ridiculing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
syntax error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a loony replies,its all in the entropy. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sparse data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Run-length encoding? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
proper run length coding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But how do you know... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
slight mistake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
By definition! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
go outside the box | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Or more RAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if 256 byte not sufficient![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |