| ??? 05/19/06 14:24 Read: times |
#116659 - How about helping rather than ridiculing Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Steve ... Really now ... I'd have thought you capable of better.
This guy wants REAL help, and he's provided almost enough information enough to illicit reasonable replies. You, OTOH, have seized upon the opportunity to make fun, and to drive the thread off-topic. Is that appropriate? RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Ram Compression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Elaborate please ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ram compression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What kind of data are we looking at ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Further elaboration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ram compression | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Extra bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In that case ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes it can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Err... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hang on a minute | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Information vs. Meaning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about helping rather than ridiculing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT ridiculing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| syntax error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a loony replies,its all in the entropy. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sparse data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Run-length encoding? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| proper run length coding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But how do you know... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| slight mistake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| By definition! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| go outside the box | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or more RAM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if 256 byte not sufficient | 01/01/70 00:00 |