Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/09/06 15:10
Read: times


 
#118101 - Being careful...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Richard said:
When I need a delayed pulse, I prefer to build my own, which, by the way, I very seldom do, using a schmidt-triggered nand gate, with the same input to both inputs, albeit one delayed via series resistor followed by a cap to GND. This is essentially what a one-shot is, with the exception that one can calculate the time between the beginning and end of the delay.

Ganeshan, if you read between these lines, some very important point can be seen: Richard obviously knows, when the triggering edges arrive! This is a basic requirement for working successfully with a monoflop (even it its retriggerable) or its simpler variant Richard mentioned above: When using a monoflop you should always know, when it is triggered, in relation to the whole pulse and especially to the back edge.

This is also violated by your application: You do not know when the pulses arrive as you suffer from switch bounce. And what the micro fabricates with an erratic and unpredictable pulse train at its reset pin, we can guess...

Again, use the MAX1232 with its /PBRST input for this purpose. This chip was designed to provide stable reset pulses.

Kai

List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Cable Capacitance Problem ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Theorizing? this should be fairly easy t            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes. Lamp is turned OFF and ON            01/01/70 00:00      
         I take that this is simultaneous to my a            01/01/70 00:00      
      The one-shot is probably a factor            01/01/70 00:00      
         Schematic upload - how to do it?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Here is the link            01/01/70 00:00      
   Lamp is working like PTC            01/01/70 00:00      
      in the olden days, they were called URDO            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks for the explanation.            01/01/70 00:00      
            because            01/01/70 00:00      
   I miss the urgently needed bandwidth lim            01/01/70 00:00      
       I agree, the idea was too simplistic            01/01/70 00:00      
         peanuts...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I'd say            01/01/70 00:00      
      Working Solution            01/01/70 00:00      
         I don't think it's solved...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Details            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hello?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  try this, try that, go broke            01/01/70 00:00      
               In many companies, it will get you fired            01/01/70 00:00      
                  expanding            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Just debating            01/01/70 00:00      
                     They're a crutch ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     so called professionals that believe tha            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Monoflops            01/01/70 00:00      
                        burnt child shy fire            01/01/70 00:00      
                        If you are careful, they might work.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           not very good odds            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Being careful...            01/01/70 00:00      
         not noise supression            01/01/70 00:00      
   does the ULN(can't read the numbers) dri            01/01/70 00:00      
      ULN2003            01/01/70 00:00      
         I did NOT ask for the part number, I ask            01/01/70 00:00      
            By other words...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Books don't say all this.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List