??? 08/31/06 23:25 Read: times |
#123479 - OK Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Turns out "unsigned char volatile" did the trick. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. |
Topic | Author | Date |
^= , Checksum, Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Have you tried a simulator? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
volatile? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
using ICE ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
update code (working) and clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Think about your variable types | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Magic numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but don't be "oversmart" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
example? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
advantages | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the most often forgotten quality guarantee![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so, use structures! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
padding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actual Output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C99 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
making up your own | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FYI - C99 Exact- & Minimum-width types | 01/01/70 00:00 |