| ??? 09/09/06 14:57 Read: times |
#123971 - making up your own Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
C99 also defines most required int types of specific size and signedness in stdint.h. No need to create your own. Just include it and use uint8_t. Andy Neil said:
And C99 did this for precisely the reasons that I've said.
Trouble is, many (most?) embedded 'C' compilers are not C99; Keil certainly isn't, and I think SDCC isn't So, unfortunately, most of us do still have to create our own. :-( When you need to create your own it might be wise to stick to the names C already defined in the standard. I have no clue if Keil has a <stdint.h> but SDCC certainly has. Both compilers will never be C99 compliant, but one can try to get near if there is no reason not to. Maarten |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ^= , Checksum, Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you tried a simulator? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using ICE ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| update code (working) and clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think about your variable types | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Magic numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but don't be "oversmart" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| example? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| advantages | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the most often forgotten quality guarantee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so, use structures! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| padding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actual Output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C99 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| making up your own | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FYI - C99 Exact- & Minimum-width types | 01/01/70 00:00 |