| ??? 09/09/06 16:20 Read: times |
#123975 - Names Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Maarten Brock said:
When you need to create your own it might be wise to stick to the names C already defined in the standard. That's a good point. I use U8, S16, etc because I've been using them for years - long before C99 came out! But, for someone just starting out, adopting the defined names is a good idea. (personally, I find the C99 names somewhat cumbersome - which is a demotivator for me to change) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ^= , Checksum, Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you tried a simulator? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| volatile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using ICE ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| update code (working) and clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Style | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think about your variable types | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Magic numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but don't be "oversmart" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| example? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| advantages | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the most often forgotten quality guarantee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so, use structures! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| padding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actual Output | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C99 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| making up your own | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Names | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FYI - C99 Exact- & Minimum-width types | 01/01/70 00:00 |