| ??? 09/12/06 11:04 Read: times |
#124117 - thanks Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks for sharing your experience. Great for those, who want to learn from other's errors. This is the sort of errors which can drive one really mad.
On the other hand, it takes a bit of courage to admit your own errors, I appreciate it. I updated the "my code no work" FAQ, giving link to this thread, I hope you don't mind. Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| P0 not low enough (0.85V) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not useful? Overrated?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Diodes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A path to GND would still be needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| paths to GND might be fatal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks for the tip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rather low ohmic path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if that is so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P0 - all's well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Richard, I hope you are well now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily for long | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Aware of that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't this whole thing rather silly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good practice, Richard... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nooooooo... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Newbies aren't rigorous! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That\'s one place where we can help them! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| still glad I posted this one! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's maybe better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's a silly mistake, but one we've all made! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the definition of experience: | 01/01/70 00:00 |