Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/13/06 17:34
Modified:
  09/13/06 17:35

Read: times


 
#124232 - That\'s one place where we can help them!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
If we put enough emphasis on rigorous methods in circuit construction, particularly when it's to be done at the kitchen table, with wire and soldering iron rather than by simply soldering up a PCB, which is much less likely to cause trouble of this sort, though one CAN forget to solder a connection.

As it happens, I produce circuits which, in many cases, never become PCB's. They're one-of-a-kind, or maybe as many as a half dozen, but they're wire-wrapped (because I learned and became accustomed to that technique decades ago) because I can do that in-house, or have someone else do it here and now, and, of course, there are methods to which I've become accustomed over the years that work very well. I do use special boards in those cases where I can, but it's possible to produce a well-behaved circuit on a board, soldered or wire-wrapped, by simple adherence to a few principles.

I could go on and on about how that's to be done.

Unfortunately, most newbies don't come here to ask about how to build their circuits. They build them, however they do it, and then come here to ask why they don't work. Of course, we can seldom tell them, largely because we can't SEE their work. We do sometimes get to SEE their schematics, and even more often, their code. Half of the time, the schematics and/or code are flawed. The rest of the time, it's got to be their construction technique. How can we best help them figure out what they've done wrong? All we can really do is to tell them how they should have done it. I doubt, actually, that we can all even agree on that.

Maybe it's worth some thought, effort, and discussion.

RE






List of 24 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
P0 not low enough (0.85V)            01/01/70 00:00      
   ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not useful? Overrated??            01/01/70 00:00      
   Diodes            01/01/70 00:00      
      A path to GND would still be needed            01/01/70 00:00      
         paths to GND might be fatal            01/01/70 00:00      
            Thanks for the tip            01/01/70 00:00      
            Rather low ohmic path            01/01/70 00:00      
   thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
      if that is so            01/01/70 00:00      
      P0 - all's well            01/01/70 00:00      
   Another Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
      Richard, I hope you are well now            01/01/70 00:00      
   not necessarily for long            01/01/70 00:00      
      Aware of that!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Isn't this whole thing rather silly?            01/01/70 00:00      
      good practice, Richard...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Nooooooo...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Newbies aren't rigorous!            01/01/70 00:00      
         That\'s one place where we can help them!            01/01/70 00:00      
      still glad I posted this one!            01/01/70 00:00      
         it's maybe better            01/01/70 00:00      
         It's a silly mistake, but one we've all made!            01/01/70 00:00      
            the definition of experience:            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List