| ??? 09/12/06 17:54 Read: times |
#124141 - P0 - all's well Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi,
Thanks for your posts about my P0 problem & solution. I've only been unconscious as far as 8052s are concerned - v.busy with other kit, until recently. Jan, no problem with that link to my post. If I get another good one, I'll let you know ;-) Erik, & with 30+ years' experience, I must be really really mad, n'est-ce pas? Regards, Richard in Belgium |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| P0 not low enough (0.85V) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not useful? Overrated?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Diodes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A path to GND would still be needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| paths to GND might be fatal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks for the tip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rather low ohmic path | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if that is so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P0 - all's well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Richard, I hope you are well now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily for long | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Aware of that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Isn't this whole thing rather silly? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good practice, Richard... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nooooooo... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Newbies aren't rigorous! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That\'s one place where we can help them! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| still glad I posted this one! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's maybe better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's a silly mistake, but one we've all made! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the definition of experience: | 01/01/70 00:00 |