Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/06/06 09:22
Read: times


 		 #125890 - I didn't know that is the standard way...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Thanks Andy,
to be honest I didn't know that this is the standard way. I come from the easyer higher PC world with plenty of memory(Visual C++, .NET etc..), so I assumed module in embedded C means grouped functions in one C file realising a functionality.

I've read several articles, books about embedded C programming but neither mentioned that each function should be in a separate file. I have just seen this solution in Chipcon 8051 variant libraries and assumed it's becaus of this overlaying.

But I have seen Microchip libraries where the functions were in one big c and header file.


List of 32 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Uncalled segments problem with library            01/01/70 00:00      
   Work with the tools!            01/01/70 00:00      
      I didn't know that is the standard way...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not a 'C' language issue.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not True            01/01/70 00:00      
   abstraction my butt            01/01/70 00:00      
      Abstraction HAS a meaning in embedded            01/01/70 00:00      
         yes sure            01/01/70 00:00      
         so why do you do these things            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe I don't know what abstraction is...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hardware knowledge            01/01/70 00:00      
      Abstraction: NOT Always Bad            01/01/70 00:00      
         10 points Russ            01/01/70 00:00      
            shades of grey            01/01/70 00:00      
               Maybe abstraction is not the issue            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Useful?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Pascal            01/01/70 00:00      
                     etc, etc            01/01/70 00:00      
                  is a libray function an "abstraction"?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Is a library function an abstraction?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I rest my case, m'lud            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Attila! Where are you?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  CodeArchitect?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     CodeArchitect?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     it generates source code; however            01/01/70 00:00      
         about abstraction ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            By Jove, I think you've got it!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Some more info why I wan't to use an API            01/01/70 00:00      
            a TOTALLY different story            01/01/70 00:00      
               Provide the source code...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Some more info why I wan't to use an hard disk            01/01/70 00:00      
               two mistakes            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List