| ??? 10/18/06 18:42 Read: times |
#126693 - IIC v I2C Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Erik,
I just hate the I2C monniker, it is so much more cumbersome, do you remember when a group of morons tried to rename TTL T2L? Aside from being more cumbersome, it is wrong. In the general case, I2 = I + I, not II. I2 = II only in the fortuitously unique case that I = 2. This is, of course, predicated on the dismissal of any Roman numeral implications. By the way, thanks for the link. Joe |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| IIC or, if you insist, I2C, "class" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IIC v I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's not I2C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Write what you mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that blame I gladly take | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| May I have the envelope, please ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too superior (sic?) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Brand name ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A had a look into my old basic electronics... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Half the fun... | 01/01/70 00:00 |