| ??? 10/18/06 23:18 Modified: 10/18/06 23:32 Read: times |
#126714 - I think so Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Christoph Franck said:
Isn't it a brand name thingie ? TTL I think it is. I think I have seen Philips (as they then were) documents that explained that it should be pronounced "aye-squared-see", but then go on to write it as I2C - when it should, as Joseph says, be I2C [update] Actually, the I2C spec does write it consistently as "I2C": http://www.nxp.com/acrobat_d...340011.pdf as does (much of) the current NXP site; eg, http://www.nxp.com/products/...index.html http://www.standardics.nxp.com/support/i2c/usage/ and yet other Philips documents use "I2C" and "I2C" interchangeably: http://www.standardics.nxp.com/literatur...p82b96.pdf Ho-hum. [/update] |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| IIC or, if you insist, I2C, "class" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IIC v I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's not I2C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Write what you mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that blame I gladly take | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| May I have the envelope, please ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too superior (sic?) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Brand name ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A had a look into my old basic electronics... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Half the fun... | 01/01/70 00:00 |