| ??? 10/18/06 20:01 Read: times |
#126695 - it's not I2C... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... it's I2C.
aaay squared seee :-) JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| IIC or, if you insist, I2C, "class" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IIC v I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's not I2C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Write what you mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that blame I gladly take | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| May I have the envelope, please ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too superior (sic?) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Brand name ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A had a look into my old basic electronics... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Half the fun... | 01/01/70 00:00 |



