| ??? 10/18/06 23:34 Read: times |
#126715 - Too superior (sic?) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Joseph Hebert said:
Exactly! It's only I²C if they write I²C, or if they write I^2C in the absence of either access to the extended ASCII character set or the ability to otherwise superscript. If they write I2C, they have written "aaay two seee," which does not mean I²C, I^2C or "aaaay squared seee." See: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=126714 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| IIC or, if you insist, I2C, "class" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IIC v I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's not I2C... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Write what you mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that blame I gladly take | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| May I have the envelope, please ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too superior (sic?) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Brand name ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A had a look into my old basic electronics... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Half the fun... | 01/01/70 00:00 |