| ??? 11/10/06 18:05 Read: times |
#127732 - I see what you mean.. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
I see a far greater likelyhood that runaway code may toggle the 'feed the puppy pin' than they may do the two specific consequtive writes. Yes, I see what you mean. I distinguish between tow different togglings: One from "high to low" and another from "low to high". They are placed at different locations in the code. So, the code running ill in a local loop will only repeat the one toggling instruction, which finally will not make the dog happy... Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89S8253 EEPROM data loss | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Standard question #1: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nonstandard question #1 & #2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Brown outs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| now where have I seen that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so, that is sill the case | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check the errata | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| do you remember the first 932 ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still not able to reproduce the error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If the internal POR/BOD isn't working correctly .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if that is possible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| External reset chip and and and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i agree half the way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I see what you mean.. | 01/01/70 00:00 |