| ??? 03/14/07 13:39 Modified: 03/14/07 13:42 Read: times |
#134977 - SST89E516RD Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Each indication is that this is an SST chip (rather than ST (or STM, ex SGS-Thomson)). Must have been a quiet cooperation, IMHO.
The SST website is an another mess, I admit, and I have seen no erratas so far for this chip nor for it's less-FLASH "relatives". There were several revisions for the datasheets, though, but apparently not indicating changes in silicon. Draw your own conclusions... :-) JW PS. There poweron-reset and brownout section is written in such way that I understand from it that a fully qualified reset IC is necessary with this chip, too :-( PS2 there were 3 revisions of the P89V51RD2's datasheet, too, I think I have them all but I did not make detailed comparisons what has changed - there is a "revision history" section there but it says almost nothing. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Did I miss it? P89V51RD2 Errata ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P89V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE P89V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jan Vaclavec? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SST89E516RD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re SST89E516RD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not the first time Philips have had "perfect silic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| even if it would NOT been the case... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do have great confidence that if there is a know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well I guess I'll take the plunge... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| where are you, John | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where are you? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ping me, I can help | 01/01/70 00:00 |