| ??? 03/14/07 15:07 Read: times |
#134982 - even if it would NOT been the case... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... that it is the same as the SST chip (which I am by now more than convinced that it IS); it IS a different core from the P89C51Rxy - if you don't believe me, you might perhaps believe the insider...
Mind, there are numerous sources of '51 cores around, some of them stemming back to Intel, others developed independently. And it is not uncommon that there are several independently developed cores WITHIN the same company. But, for a complete chip, it's not enough to have a 100% working core... Again, draw YOUR conclusions. JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Did I miss it? P89V51RD2 Errata ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P89V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE P89V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jan Vaclavec? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SST89E516RD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re SST89E516RD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not the first time Philips have had "perfect silic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| even if it would NOT been the case... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do have great confidence that if there is a know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well I guess I'll take the plunge... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| where are you, John | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Where are you? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ping me, I can help | 01/01/70 00:00 |