??? 03/14/07 14:44 Read: times |
#134979 - Not the first time Philips have had "perfect silic Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Maybe Erik is correct, and we have perfect silicon! But, if so, that is something that I have NEVER seen before either.
All of this is making me just a little bit nervous. I would like to use the NXP device and Flash Magic, as it is well supported by ESA, but the Atmel AT89C51RD2/ED2 is at least a "known devil" Not the first time Philips have had "perfect silicon", or, at least, "no known bugs". I have been a Philips fan for years and one thing that, in my opinion, separates them from the flock is honest, timely published errata. Personally I would take the lack of errata as meaning "no known bugs". The progression C51Rx2H to C51Rx2 to V51Rx2 may be the very reason for lack of errata, a few bugs were worked out in the predecessors. As to the Atmel AT89C51RD2/ED2 is at least a "known devil" yes, Atmel is a "known devil" especially for being late and dishonest in publishing errata. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Did I miss it? P89V51RD2 Errata ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
P89V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE P89V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jan Vaclavec? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SST89E516RD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re SST89E516RD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not the first time Philips have had "perfect silic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
even if it would NOT been the case... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do have great confidence that if there is a know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well I guess I'll take the plunge... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
where are you, John | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where are you? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ping me, I can help![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |