Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/18/07 16:31
Read: times


 		 #135201 - I think it does have internal ROM
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi Stanley,

I might be wrong but according to the datasheet, the 80C52 has 8 Kb of ROM memory. The romless version is the 80C32.

Mikel


List of 29 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Unable to use P0 and P2            01/01/70 00:00      
   How do you detect that it's ignored?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Philips 80C52            01/01/70 00:00      
         Re: 80xxx            01/01/70 00:00      
         External memory?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Re: External memory?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Check the datasheet!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  More information            01/01/70 00:00      
                     80C52            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I think it does have internal ROM            01/01/70 00:00      
                           oops!            01/01/70 00:00      
         ICE or Eprom Emulator ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            It is an in-circuit emulator            01/01/70 00:00      
   my assumption            01/01/70 00:00      
      I'm afraid it can't be            01/01/70 00:00      
         There's a special "once" mode ... for emulators            01/01/70 00:00      
         try this            01/01/70 00:00      
            Re: try this            01/01/70 00:00      
               My guess            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Read the datasheets and read the posts, Mike            01/01/70 00:00      
            How is all this supposed to help?            01/01/70 00:00      
               It has code space...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Where did you get that nonsense, Mike?            01/01/70 00:00      
   My conclusion:            01/01/70 00:00      
      What has it to do with the original question?            01/01/70 00:00      
   I do not know your emulator, but            01/01/70 00:00      
      My conclusion (and thanks for everyone)            01/01/70 00:00      
         then why not say so            01/01/70 00:00      
         Emulator            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List