Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/19/07 09:57
Read: times


 		 #135260 - My conclusion:
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I have used several Flash 8051:

P89C668
AT89C51
AT89S8252
AT89C51ED2
AT89C51CC01
DS5000 (NVRAM)

and on all these P0 and P2 works exact as expected.


Peter



List of 29 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Unable to use P0 and P2            01/01/70 00:00      
   How do you detect that it's ignored?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Philips 80C52            01/01/70 00:00      
         Re: 80xxx            01/01/70 00:00      
         External memory?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Re: External memory?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Check the datasheet!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  More information            01/01/70 00:00      
                     80C52            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I think it does have internal ROM            01/01/70 00:00      
                           oops!            01/01/70 00:00      
         ICE or Eprom Emulator ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            It is an in-circuit emulator            01/01/70 00:00      
   my assumption            01/01/70 00:00      
      I'm afraid it can't be            01/01/70 00:00      
         There's a special "once" mode ... for emulators            01/01/70 00:00      
         try this            01/01/70 00:00      
            Re: try this            01/01/70 00:00      
               My guess            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Read the datasheets and read the posts, Mike            01/01/70 00:00      
            How is all this supposed to help?            01/01/70 00:00      
               It has code space...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Where did you get that nonsense, Mike?            01/01/70 00:00      
   My conclusion:            01/01/70 00:00      
      What has it to do with the original question?            01/01/70 00:00      
   I do not know your emulator, but            01/01/70 00:00      
      My conclusion (and thanks for everyone)            01/01/70 00:00      
         then why not say so            01/01/70 00:00      
         Emulator            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List