| ??? 04/03/07 18:37 Modified: 04/03/07 18:39 Read: times |
#136524 - have you considered Responding to: ???'s previous message |
have you considered using a derivative with hardware SPI.
Bit-banged IIC slaves are a bitch to implement, but CAN insert wait states. Again, there have you considered to use chips with hardware IIC The fact is that (bit-banged) slaves have to be 'ready at all times' regardless of what protocol you use. If you have a spare interrupt on your slaves and use that for SPI clk (through an inverter?) it should be possible (I do not say 'easy') to make a functioning SPI slave without having HW SPI Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| spi woes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| have you considered | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yep i think i'll have to go with dedicated hardwar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I2C Has Wait Capability | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| good choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| make one if you miss it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You got it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re 'dislikes of IIC" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mode Fault interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 |