??? 04/13/07 05:50 Read: times |
#137114 - confused Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mike Stegmaier said:
And, your serial interrupt might not work. It allows a limited amount of clock cycles. Having an LCD display routine will use up an enormous amount of those cycles, especially when your crystal speed is high. Can you please elaborate on that? I thought that making your cpu go faster, meant that you could do things in the same amount of cycles, only the cycle time is shorter. Result: more things get done in the same amount of time. You seem to say that the faster your processor runs, the more cycles you waste... I am confused... regards Patrick |
Topic | Author | Date |
RxD to LCD problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Serial ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
work needed. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you need to control flow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
confused | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this is what I mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Non-useful Serial ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AND it's stuck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I was going for optimization. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's functioning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
now stay consistent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Terminating code? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
correct terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Missing the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i get it now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Most, but not all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why on earth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if it\'s almost correct, it\'s still wrong :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not R6 and R7 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well it happend again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Q.E.D. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One further comment is needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hey | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dangerous recommendation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
they all do![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it 'trust' the same as 'experiment'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Joe, please read this | 01/01/70 00:00 |