??? 04/14/07 13:18 Read: times |
#137250 - I was going for optimization. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Mike Stegmaier said:
now check this code out for a serial routine:
serisr: jnb RI, skipri mov A, SBUF skipri: retiIt is alot better Is it? It's certainly quick and simple - but it doesn't do anything useful at all! All it does is copy the received character from SBUF to A - but the rest of the program has absolutely no way of telling that this has happened, so cannot do anything with the received character! I wasn't putting out that code to illustrate functionality. I was only putting it out to show how you can free up more machine cycles so that if other code must be added to the ISR, it can without losing serial characters. So the code you posted is better than the first version with the delays. I wasn't going to write a full featured routine that does stuff with the character. |
Topic | Author | Date |
RxD to LCD problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Serial ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
work needed. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you need to control flow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
confused | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
this is what I mean | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Non-useful Serial ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AND it's stuck | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I was going for optimization. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's functioning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
now stay consistent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Terminating code? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
correct terminology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Missing the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
i get it now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Most, but not all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why on earth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if it\'s almost correct, it\'s still wrong :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not R6 and R7 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well it happend again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Q.E.D. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One further comment is needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hey | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dangerous recommendation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
they all do![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it 'trust' the same as 'experiment'? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Joe, please read this | 01/01/70 00:00 |