Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/24/07 06:39
Read: times


 
#137857 - Consider why one would want that ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
There are numerous ways in which one might want to use multiple crystals on a single MCU. One of these is to match the rate of an externally driven process. Another might be to synchronize with such a process being driven externally.

While it's true that some tasks won't be in any sense impaired by the multi-second reconfiguration and acquisition-time delays imposed by the PLL that's in the synthesizer, others will be negatively impacted, and, many others may not work at all because of the delay.

If you have two different rates at which you need the MCU to operate, there's usually a driving reason, one of which might be a different rate for, for example, a communication task, or a situation like what's in front of me right now, where I have a process that operates at 20.000 MHz and another that uses 19.6608 MHz (sound familiar? it's an exact harmonic of the common baud rates). When I'm processing data at the 20 MHz rate, it's very handy to be able to remain in sync with that task, while serial communication is easy using the 196608 MHz clock.

How long does it take the 'F12x to switch from one reference frequency to the other using the PLL?

RE




List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
two crystals            01/01/70 00:00      
   Crystal connections            01/01/70 00:00      
      wires very very short            01/01/70 00:00      
         Youd be better off with a pair of DIY oscillators            01/01/70 00:00      
            why not use a derivative with a PLL?            01/01/70 00:00      
               What's a PPL?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Phase Locked Loop            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It's not a very general sort of PLL            01/01/70 00:00      
                        apples and oranges            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Consider why one would want that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        PLL lock timing            01/01/70 00:00      
                           support droids didn't notice that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              .. err make that "jibe" : -)            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Atmel MCU with PLL?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        sometimes two wants do not jive            01/01/70 00:00      
                        sadly atmel 8051 derivatives dont            01/01/70 00:00      
            Am I right Richard?            01/01/70 00:00      
               What I meant ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Koosha, we need an answer            01/01/70 00:00      
      What is in my mind...            01/01/70 00:00      
         why a switch ? It will give you all kins of proble            01/01/70 00:00      
         Maybe use a jumper instead of a switch?            01/01/70 00:00      
            better, yes, as good as none no.            01/01/70 00:00      
            it's commonly used.            01/01/70 00:00      
               all the story!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Capacitor size            01/01/70 00:00      
                  whare is the uC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The uC is in the ZIF socket            01/01/70 00:00      
                  not this type of switch, please            01/01/70 00:00      
                  consider ALL the components!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Thank you!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List