| ??? 05/31/07 12:18 Read: times |
#140104 - a known practice, but do not rely on it Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I was wondering also if the p89lpc925s I have are repackaged 935s or 936s
A known practice, but do not rely on it. This is not the first time such has happened (not a NXP thing, they all do it). HOWEVER, it has also been known that chips that pass all tests except one have been relabelled with the number of a part where the feature that did not pass the test is not 'supposed' to be there. Some of us remember '31s that had a mask program in them because they were relabelled '51s where the maks program failed. THUS, if you find more in a chip than you expect, DO NOT expect the 'bonus feature' to be fully operational. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| p89lpc925 with xdata? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correction: p89lpc925 with xdata? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it is quite common (always?) that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| see pg. 3 of the datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oodles and bunches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can you point me to ONE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I just pointed you to two (groups) with 8k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is "Internal"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| quite so! it's logical vs physical | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| page 13 of the user manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's really interesting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "a picture is worth a thousand words" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
even the picture is misleading | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| p89lpc938 has 512 bytes of XDATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, but the lpc 925 has only 256 bytes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| p89lpc925 with 256 data + 512 xdata? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| put your glasses on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P89LPC925FN 20-dip package | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a known practice, but do not rely on it | 01/01/70 00:00 |