??? 06/12/07 13:51 Modified: 06/12/07 13:59 Read: times |
#140590 - no, did not Responding to: ???'s previous message |
(you did not try the mod I made a couple of years ago implementing the '485 turnaround, did you?... :-) ).
no, I did not, not for lack of appreciation, but because the demands of the project had moved it to a SILabs chip. I have, for abot 2-3 years not done any devlopment involving any NXP micros. I see some such possibility on the horizon and will, at that time, have a look. also for the feeble minded identical to the SST chip please not "the SST chip" but "the SST 123456789". I would expect that this synergy is a result of a development at Crolles. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Removing P89v51 Bootloader | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
according to the datasheet.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Jan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bootloader v7 and PSEN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no pins needed ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Best solution: IAP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
backdoor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TxD pulled down for ISP. Clever! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IAP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if this is a problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the enhanced bootloader... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what enhanced bootloader | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no, did not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OT: SiLabs -> NXP? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no, NXP ->SILabs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SST89V516RD/SST89E516RD for 5V/3V part![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |