Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/08/07 06:16
Read: times


 
#141578 - there is a simple reason ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Namely that there's a shortage of I/O's, and no shortage of internal resources where the CPLD is concerned. The notion of the adder comes from the fact that what happens whenever there's a data memory read to 0xC000 and above, is that the logic adds a four to the top nybble of the 18-bit address, limiting the range to what will fit in the available 256 kB of SRAM.

At this moment, I'm considering using a completely different circuit, perhaps with a larger pin-count CPLD, whereby I can put all the latches, etc, in the CPLD and operate on each memory IC separately. That might prove much more flexible. Those old 5-volt 128-macrocell CPLD's cost about $3 last time I bought them, while the 72 macrocell PLCC-44 types cost twice that. They're both 7 ns parts ...

RE




List of 23 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
What sorts of memory \"expansion\" have you tried?            01/01/70 00:00      
   why the adder?            01/01/70 00:00      
      it's a preliminary notion            01/01/70 00:00      
         I am talking about the textbook example...            01/01/70 00:00      
            there is a simple reason ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               whatizit?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I\'m trying something odd ... and retro ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     reading            01/01/70 00:00      
                        it's part of a larger process            01/01/70 00:00      
                           why that fast?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              It\'s because I know \"nothing\" about the controller            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I still have questions.... :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    We're not quite on the same page, Jan            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       formatting            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          must be a bug in the display code ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             please switch to the phpBB mode (temporarily)...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                I can see something's odd, but I don't know what            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       conclusions and maybe a few more ideas            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          coping with the wierdness is my job            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             just a thought            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Yes            01/01/70 00:00      
   increment the page register            01/01/70 00:00      
      I though of that ...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List