| ??? 01/18/08 21:30 Read: times |
#149718 - no one Responding to: ???'s previous message |
OK, this is negativistic; but I see the '51 on the losing side from this perspective. Sorry, the manufacturers of '51 are not as flexible as they might be - see the competition. Or they simply don't want the garage- and hobby-scale customers, so they hush them away with their approach. Or they simply just try to collect as much money as possible with the old dusty designs, without throwing in an another money. This is the status quo. See Lynn Reed's report from the embedded conference.
I said it long ago - let's throw together the money, design, and get THE PERFECT 8051 manufactured ourselves. JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What micro would you use? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LPC9xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would be a good option... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how do they use them then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't use them... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I was just asking if someone would use that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We are talking about devboards, do we? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "slightly less than mass" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UART-ISP is not an option... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: How do they use them? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Perfect??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You missed one... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh goodness, yes! That's very important ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends upon the required functionality .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cygnal TQFP package , I would avoide any | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SILabs (nee Cygnal) a warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik even they dont hate calling their forum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| only a few digital I/O | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ... or the VRS for that matter, but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |