| ??? 01/21/08 00:01 Read: times |
#149790 - yes I know Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yes, I know that. I was just responding to your comments about pads on the PCB for ICP. If a LPC903 could be programmed ICP with just pads and no jumpers, and then work by talking to a host PC through the UART and USB virtual serial port chip, that could work.
But the question in my original post was, "Why can't you just put some chips on a board, plug in to the USB, and ISP a chip". I guess this is not commonly done. I thought that someone would answer by saying LPC9xx, where xx is the simplest one that can do ISP, but you were also telling me the dangers of ["suicide" on a soldered-down LPC9xx] so I guess it is not a good idea. I build in low production quantities, so I do not differentiate between "production programming" and "field updates". |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| What micro would you use? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LPC9xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would be a good option... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how do they use them then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't use them... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I was just asking if someone would use that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We are talking about devboards, do we? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "slightly less than mass" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UART-ISP is not an option... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: How do they use them? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no one | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Perfect??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You missed one... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh goodness, yes! That's very important ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends upon the required functionality .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cygnal TQFP package , I would avoide any | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You can | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SILabs (nee Cygnal) a warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Erik even they dont hate calling their forum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| only a few digital I/O | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ... or the VRS for that matter, but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |