| ??? 01/28/08 10:23 Read: times |
#149998 - biggest problem vs. nightmare Responding to: ???'s previous message |
David Prentice said:
Because the 8051 has SO many derivatives, I can see that it will be a nightmare to maintain the device tables and ensure that "features" are overcome.
The biggest problem is portability. As far as I know the more sophisticated Wizards are bound to specific compilers. Naming conventions, memory addressing and interrupt syntax vary widely. I disagree that portability is the biggest problem. I think the so-many-derivatives nightmare is much worse. Maarten |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Weekend question: What repeats frequently on '51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tools in Assem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Repeated tasks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mSec Clock Tick, off a timer interrupt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CodeArchitect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C runtime initializer tool | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Generate Skeleton C code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| biggest problem vs. nightmare | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i think oranges and apples | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's the other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re SILabs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a general note on stuff like this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you missed the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| misunderstanding squared | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| of course it does ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too much like hard work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a most hnorable 'like' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OOPS a doublr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hard work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assembly programmers not the worst | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another Example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| neighbours | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code Architect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
options are good | 01/01/70 00:00 |