Problem waking up from power down mode:AT89S52 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Have you seen the pulse? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Saw tthat | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I agree! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
monoflop IC number? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
also know as one shot (in the foot) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Supervisor chip? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
try digikey | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Can you explain how that would help? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
how about 4538? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
You can, but also read this... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Maybe rather than a monoflop.... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Ehem... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Ehem....Hmmm | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Why messy? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Remember that the oscillator is turned off | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
So using a one-shot seems the best idea..right? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
a one shot should always ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I tried using an RC circuit...but it did not work | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
sorry, I was wrong | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
If one shot is a close second... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I'd rather not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
but problem with FF is that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
ah, Arghmel | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not same part | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
If You Use PCF8563 RTC... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
555 vs '121? Which is better? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
121 .. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I used a 74LS121 and... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
yes it will, but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
HC and HCT? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
there is this fancy newfangled thing .... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
There is no 74HC121, but HC123 and HC221 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Should really consider.... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I really would consider PCF8563 but... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Digital pulse is still better | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I would try this | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
elegant, but why .... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
You can, of course, but... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
reg power consumtption... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Have you seen my circuit? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Pulse Mode from RTC,,,, | | 01/01/70 00:00 |