| ??? 04/03/08 12:28 Read: times |
#152916 - critical code ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
And, in the 50 and 100MHz derivatives things got a bit worse because of the caching.
.. can be "cache locked" I agree that, while 1 clock at 100 MHz sounds like 100 times faster that a 12MHz oldie, the real factor is something like 50. It is, indeed a fact that those that write "sales litterature" conveniently forget. Nevertheless the f12/f13x still are the speed demons of the '51s with the possible exception of some "cores" Erik can you please do me a favour: rip off a piece of a *real life* code do you have Keil?, if not what form do you need C source, asm list or what? [edit] what I state is based in the f12x/f13x, due to lack of interest in battey life (24V 300A lead-acid accumulatoes supply more than enough) I have not checked on the .9V thingy they just introduced. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Low Power | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| clocks/instruction - some hairsplitting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really 'quite' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what the #$&* is "most"? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| critical code ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cache lock won't really help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the issue is critical code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a proper simulator would help | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In that case I doubt you will be able to buy ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This was not a "first" responder ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Challenger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| benchmark | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Experiment report: Dhrystone results | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nice work | 01/01/70 00:00 |