??? 04/05/08 20:23 Read: times |
#152984 - RE:receiving inspection Responding to: ???'s previous message |
First i'd like to thank u for taking the time to reply, as for the inspection that i do, i actually never thought about doing a spot or exhaustive tests on the components, which after reading what u wrote i now thik i shouild've. but the thing is thats a graduation project and we're doing only one so it's not like we're buying "lots" of components, but we should test the components b4 using them anyway.
after reading what u wrote i found that my idea of designing a built in self diagnosis wasnt of much use or at least not in the way i thought of. |
Topic | Author | Date |
only 3 empty pins while i need at least 8 o/p pins | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What is it checking for Highs lows? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
data aquisition system of a satellite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is it really necessary? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
unfortunatelly it is necessary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
here's one way ... use it at your own risk ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the self diagnosis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What you should ask him is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:What you should ask him is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's not pointless, but it is costly. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:Type of test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simple tests use loopbacks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
receiving inspection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:receiving inspection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You should probably do what your instructor says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:you should probably do what the instructor says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Instead the input buffers.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
aside from internal memory test and port checks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you.....![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |