| ??? 10/05/01 20:59 Read: times |
#15470 - RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn |
Richards,
looks good but checks the address lines not the RAM "per se". Faster but not the Alexanders original intention. Having said this i believe this test would catch the most likely "real-world" fault as RAMS are damn reliable. regards, p |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC, Phillip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC, Phillip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC, Phillip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC-P0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC-P0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Richard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Walking 1's and 0's fast Test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC: swap | 01/01/70 00:00 |



