Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/06/01 08:53
Read: times


 
#15480 - RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn
Indeed, this was *not* written to check the chip, just the assembled product (the original full test was sanctioned by the safety-at-work inspector - the operator would fall asleep & fall off his chair! 8-)
Inspired by the "check address lines" phrase : has anyone ever swapped around the address lines &/or the data lines, either by design or by accident (manual routing)? In theory, it should make no difference (Eprom is another kettle of fish!).

Regards,

Richard


List of 19 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
testing 6264 SRAM IC            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC, Phillip            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC, Phillip            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC, Phillip            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC-P0            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC-P0            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Richard            01/01/70 00:00      
Walking 1's and 0's fast Test            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC: swap            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List