| ??? 10/06/01 08:53 Read: times |
#15480 - RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn |
Indeed, this was *not* written to check the chip, just the assembled product (the original full test was sanctioned by the safety-at-work inspector - the operator would fall asleep & fall off his chair! 8-)
Inspired by the "check address lines" phrase : has anyone ever swapped around the address lines &/or the data lines, either by design or by accident (manual routing)? In theory, it should make no difference (Eprom is another kettle of fish!). Regards, Richard |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC, Phillip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC, Phillip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC, Phillip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC-P0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC-P0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Richard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Walking 1's and 0's fast Test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC:Bordyn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: testing 6264 SRAM IC: swap | 01/01/70 00:00 |



